Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 22:13:39 GMT -6
The Federal Public Ministry of Pernambuco reported to the Court a former intern at Caixa Econômica Federal. He is accused of stealing R$ from bank customer accounts. In the action the former intern is equated with a public employee as he works in a financial institution in the form of a public company.
In cases where a public official steals money value or property due to his position he commits the crime of embezzlement provided for in the Penal Code in paragraph of article which provides for sentences of imprisonment from two to years and a fine.
According to the MPF the accused took advantage of his role in helping elderly customers or those with difficulties in selfservice at ATMs to memorize the victims' passwords. He then registered the person on internet banking thus having BTC Number Data access to the current account. First the accused transferred the amount to an account belonging to his uncle. He then transferred the money to two accounts he owned from which he made withdrawals and payments.
Between May and July the former intern committed the crime in bank transfer operations of different amounts. The cases occurred in Jaboatão dos Guararapes metropolitan region of Pernambuco. With information from the MPFPE Social Communication Office .
Regarding condominium fees he highlighted that the successors proposed paying off the debt with the deceased's PIS balance which was not accepted by Caixa with the justification that the amount would be insufficient. For the magistrate although there is a contractual provision that nonpayment of condominium fees may also lead to early expiration of the contract and repossession [clause seven] it appears that the value of these in relation to the total property which will be paid by insurance is ridiculous. The judge understood that there was no negligence on the part of the authors with the payment as they sought to make part of it through the PIS balance which would avoid the eviction of Cleusa and her son.
''As explained at length and beautifully by CEF in its initial PAR contracts are of an eminently social nature they are intended to help lowincome people acquire a property to live in and put an end to their serious housing problem. It is completely contrary to the social purposes stated by the author that she insists on not making any agreement with the defendants even after several attacks from the Court and even knowing the tragedy that befell the family and that would destroy any person'' added the judge.
In cases where a public official steals money value or property due to his position he commits the crime of embezzlement provided for in the Penal Code in paragraph of article which provides for sentences of imprisonment from two to years and a fine.
According to the MPF the accused took advantage of his role in helping elderly customers or those with difficulties in selfservice at ATMs to memorize the victims' passwords. He then registered the person on internet banking thus having BTC Number Data access to the current account. First the accused transferred the amount to an account belonging to his uncle. He then transferred the money to two accounts he owned from which he made withdrawals and payments.
Between May and July the former intern committed the crime in bank transfer operations of different amounts. The cases occurred in Jaboatão dos Guararapes metropolitan region of Pernambuco. With information from the MPFPE Social Communication Office .
Regarding condominium fees he highlighted that the successors proposed paying off the debt with the deceased's PIS balance which was not accepted by Caixa with the justification that the amount would be insufficient. For the magistrate although there is a contractual provision that nonpayment of condominium fees may also lead to early expiration of the contract and repossession [clause seven] it appears that the value of these in relation to the total property which will be paid by insurance is ridiculous. The judge understood that there was no negligence on the part of the authors with the payment as they sought to make part of it through the PIS balance which would avoid the eviction of Cleusa and her son.
''As explained at length and beautifully by CEF in its initial PAR contracts are of an eminently social nature they are intended to help lowincome people acquire a property to live in and put an end to their serious housing problem. It is completely contrary to the social purposes stated by the author that she insists on not making any agreement with the defendants even after several attacks from the Court and even knowing the tragedy that befell the family and that would destroy any person'' added the judge.